An angel says yes, the amount is agreed, and then comes the question many first-time founders are not ready for: "What paper are we using?" In Silicon Valley the default answer is a SAFE. In Qatar it is more complicated. The instrument that is quickest to sign is not always the one that converts cleanly under Qatari company law, and a mistake at the pre-seed stage can surface 18 months later, just as a Series A investor is reviewing the cap table. This guide explains the three main options, where each one runs into Qatar-specific friction, and how to choose.
This article is general information, not legal advice. Instrument choice, drafting and conversion steps should be reviewed by a lawyer qualified in the relevant Qatari jurisdiction.
The post-money SAFE in plain terms
A SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) gives an investor the right to receive shares later, usually when the company raises a priced equity round. Y Combinator's standard form is the post-money SAFE, first released in 2018 and last updated as version 1.2 in February 2023, according to YC's Post-Money SAFE User Guide. Its main features:
-
Valuation cap. The cap is "post" all the SAFE money, so ownership can be calculated on the day you sign: investment divided by cap. YC's own example is $1 million raised at a ~$6.7 million post-money cap, which works out to about 15% of the company.
-
Versions. YC's documents page offers a cap-only SAFE, a discount-only SAFE and an "uncapped MFN" SAFE.
-
MFN. The most-favoured-nation SAFE has no cap and no discount. If the company later issues SAFEs on better terms, the investor can amend theirs to match, usually once.
-
Pro rata. Rights to invest in the next round are not in the SAFE itself. They sit in an optional side letter that works only with capped versions.
A SAFE is not a loan. As Stripe's comparison puts it, SAFEs do not accrue interest, have no maturity date and carry no repayment obligation. That is good for the founder, and it is also the reason investors ask more questions about SAFEs in Qatar.
Why SAFEs are harder onshore in Qatar
Most mainland startups are limited liability companies under Law No. 11 of 2015 (the Commercial Companies Law, as amended). Charles Russell Speechlys notes that a SAFE "sits somewhat uneasily within this framework". It grants a right to an unspecified number of future shares, while the Companies Law is built around issued shares within registered capital. The practical consequences:
-
Conversion is not automatic. Issuing the shares may require shareholder approvals, amendments to the constitutional documents and formal corporate procedures. A US SAFE assumes the board can simply issue stock.
-
The investor's remedy may be money, not shares. Until conversion, the SAFE holder is a contract counterparty, not a shareholder. If the company does not complete the corporate steps, the investor may only be able to "pursue a claim for damages rather than obtaining the equity interest it expected to receive", according to the same analysis.
-
Weak position in insolvency. SAFE holders are unlikely to have the protections of secured or preferential creditors.
-
Untested. The firm notes that many SAFE assumptions "have not yet been tested before the Qatari courts or the QFC courts".
There is also a Sharia question. Under Qatari law a contract over a future asset can be valid if its subject matter is sufficiently defined and excessive uncertainty (gharar) is avoided. Some investors, however, see a contingent right to shares that may never exist as too uncertain. Carta and GLA & Company note that many experts regard SAFEs as unacceptably speculative for this reason, and that traditional Islamic corporate rules, under which all shareholders hold identical rights, sit uneasily with preferred shares and negotiated terms. Where Sharia compliance matters to your investors, get specialist advice.
The QFC alternative
The Qatar Financial Centre runs a common-law framework under Law No. 7 of 2005. Charles Russell Speechlys calls it more compatible with SAFE mechanics. A QFC company can use authorised share capital, "allowing shares to be allotted pursuant to pre-agreed conversion mechanics", provided enough authorised but unissued shares remain. It can also create multiple share classes with tailored investor rights. Carta and GLA & Company add that the QFC courts can compel a company to issue the shares owed under a SAFE (specific performance), which goes to the core of the onshore enforceability concern.
That is why many founders who expect to raise several rounds look at a QFC holding structure early. It is not right for everyone: licensing, cost and the nature of the business all matter. Make the decision before you sign the first SAFE, not after.
Convertible loans and priced rounds: when they fit better
Convertible loan (convertible note). This is debt that is expected to convert into equity. Unlike a SAFE, it typically accrues interest, has a maturity date and must be repaid if it does not convert, according to Stripe. That gives investors a creditor's claim, which some prefer where onshore conversion is uncertain. The trade-off is a deadline: if the next round slips past maturity, investors may be able to demand repayment. For Sharia-sensitive investors, Charles Russell Speechlys points to convertible musharaka structures as one mainland alternative.
Priced round. The investor buys shares at an agreed valuation and becomes a shareholder straight away. It costs more in legal time and forces a valuation conversation, but it removes conversion risk completely. Onshore, where every share issue involves corporate formalities anyway, a small priced round can be simpler than it sounds.
As general guidance:
- Use a SAFE when you are in the QFC (or have checked your onshore constitution), the next round's timing is uncertain and investors are comfortable with the instrument.
- Use a convertible loan when investors want creditor protection or onshore conversion is uncertain, and you are confident of a priced round before maturity.
- Use a priced round when the cheque is large, an investor wants governance rights now, or Sharia-sensitive investors will not accept a contingent instrument.
How this connects to Startup Qatar and Vision 2030
Qatar National Vision 2030 and NDS3 depend on a private sector that can fund its own growth, and the state has committed capital to make that happen. QIA's venture Fund of Funds, launched in February 2024, will invest USD 3 billion in international and regional VC funds, with the stated aim of helping "close the current funding gap for local and regional entrepreneurs". As more fund managers set up in Doha under Startup Qatar, more capital will reach early-stage founders. That capital moves faster when founders hand over clean, enforceable paper. Choosing the right instrument is part of making the ecosystem investable.
What to do next
-
Check your structure first. Before you sign anything, find out whether you are an onshore LLC or a QFC company, and what your constitutional documents say about issuing new shares and share classes.
-
Model the dilution. With a post-money cap, divide investment by cap and add up every SAFE. Know your total dilution before the priced round arrives.
-
Write down the conversion steps. For onshore companies, list the approvals and amendments conversion will need, and get investors and founders to commit to them in writing.
-
Agree the post-conversion governance now. Share class rights, liquidation preference, board seats and consent rights will need a shareholders' agreement later. Sketch it now.
-
Ask your investors about Sharia early. If it matters to them, involve a Sharia adviser before the term sheet, not after.
-
Use a lawyer for the paper. YC's templates are written for US and selected other companies. A Qatar-qualified lawyer should adapt the documents or choose an alternative.
Sources
Photo: RDNE Stock project / Pexels
شارك:
Qatar's National Manufacturing Strategy: 2030 Targets, Progress So Far and Where SMEs Fit
Doha Investment Explained: What QIA's New Platform Means for Startups and SMEs